NREGA :
And relaxation, and somet imes fighting, and caught Pranab Mukherjee with the expectations of the heat during the discussion of high prices. Excerpts:
There is a feeling that with aadmi has been ignored in the budget, which is viewed as more companies, at the expense of taxpayers and friendly.
If you look at the social sector component of the plan expenditure in the budget, which is 37 per cent of the total Rs 3,73,092 crore. We have sufficient provisions for primary education, which is primarily for aadmi with, after giving the right to education from the age of 6-14. We have adequate provision for monitoring of NREGA and Bharat Nirman. Aadmi with care, and investments in infrastructure, including infrastructure in rural areas, have increased. To ensure that the benefits in accordance with the rights granted for aadmi with are met, adequate provisions have been made.
M on both, and you have shown that the populist policies that would pave the way for a prudent fiscal measures. United Progressive Alliance had abandoned the common man in an attempt to reduce support?
I have provided Rs 1,16,224 crore for subsidies. As I explained very nicely, and the emphasis of the budgets is to return to a path of fiscal consolidation, but to sustain overall growth, which means growth with aadmi. So, where is the question of abandonment with
Several pilot programs – NREGA or the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (south) or the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM), is not supported by sufficient funds to factor in the high rate of inflation and increasing demand.
This is not true. This is the legal entitlements. As far as NREGA is concerned, there is no question of scarcity of funds. If any money is required, provided that it is. In any one year will have the money spent in full. There is no program of social sector is starved for funds. The question is how wisely and promptly, which can benefit from them. We concentrate on that.
Your party does not support the position on the reduction of subsidies?
How are you concerned about the issues my party? This is my country, after consideration, and you do not have a look yet. I am a party; you are not a person is a party. I know. I have lived in this party over the past 40 years. This is my political management of the problem. No need to worry more.
If you had said that the budget is a document of vision, it does not indicate how the government expects the poor to cope with rising inflation and shrinking income.
Inflation is a cause for concern, especially food inflation. But not because of administrative policy or fiscal policy. To a large extent, is due to the imbalance in supply and demand. To alleviate the suffering of the common people, especially those below the poverty line, and we have backed materials. But the delivery mechanism is not strong. Another important factor is that the cost of mediation is very high. How do I limit will also be considered.
Where and why are we going wrong in our management of food and agriculture reforms?
We are not going wrong. Food production, food procurement and distribution of already steadily. The question is that we must get to the desired level of production, procurement and distribution. We have already pointed out that the Green Revolution will be extended to the eastern regions. Will then be possible for us to increase production significantly. Food is one of the key components for better management of the economy, and therefore we should be focusing on. I do not think it failed.
No comments:
Post a Comment